Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunay Demir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gunay Demir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient reliable sources independent of the subject to verify notability. A Google News Archive search got a few hit but after runng them through a translator was not able to find anything significant. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. J04n(talk page) 01:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The current form of the article qualifies as an unsourced BLP. My web searching did not come up with any online material that could serve as a basis for the article. Some Turkish publications mention him, but usually as just one name in a list. There seems to be an unrelated sportsman named Gunay Demir. If his resume stated he had won any prizes, we could try to figure out if they were significant. His own website does not mention if he has ever exhibited outside Turkey, so we can't judge whether he is known internationally. There is just too little to work with here. EdJohnston (talk) 03:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 3 years and still no refs or proof of notability. Also a bit suspicious that creating this was the creator's only ever edit to Wikipedia - possible coi. Markiewp (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete Fails WP:N and WP:V JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Lionel (talk) 03:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.