Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gukjeong chumyo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I believe the nomination has been withdrawn and consensus is to Keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gukjeong chumyo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot identify any sources on Google Scholar, Google News, and Google Books. General search also brings up nothing that can establish notability. There may be information that can establish notability in Korean. If notability can't be established then content could be merged with Byeon Sang-byeok Traumnovelle (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Animal, Korea, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, it is sourced via pamphlet to its holding museum. Artworks on Wikipedia are considered to have notability if they have a museum source. It is by famous Korean artist Byeon Sang-byeok, so the article's existence here since 2009 has enhanced Wikipedia's Korean art collection. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a link to that guideline? I couldn't find any art specific notability guidelines. Traumnovelle (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge It's a very Korean painting that has always been in Korea, so an absence of web sources in English (but using a Korean title, presumably) means very little indeed. We only seem to have about a dozen articles on individual Korean paintings, which is far too few, given their distinctive and old tradition. Byeon Sang-byeok, the artist, is a significant figure, with one only one other article on an individual work. I don't doubt there are lots of sources in Korean; perhaps someone from the Korean project can find some. Johnbod (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep and no merge. Sufficient individual notability in Korean language [1] (Kansong Art Museum), [2] (Kyunghyang Shinmun), [3] (The Dong-a Ilbo), and more. I'm sure it's covered extensively in print books on art too. toobigtokale (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're familiar with Korean could you add these into the article? Traumnovelle (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can quickly put some stuff in; my to-do list is pretty long so I want to prioritize other major articles if that makes sense. Lot of important missing info about Korea on Wikipedia toobigtokale (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I'll take your word that the sources you've provided establish notability and change my stance to keep/withdraw the nomination. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.