Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GroupLeader.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GroupLeader.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable website. No reliable sources. Wikieditor600 (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. Only "claim to notability" seems to be that it is (was?) a "sister company to Ireland's largest escorted tour holiday provider". Which is far from a significant notability claim. A view of the archived version of the subject's "in the news" page suggests some limited coverage. Like being one of 10+ finalists in some 2014 regional blog award. Nothing that demonstrates WP:SIGCOV. A search on Ireland's two main newspapers of record returns only trivial mentions and the typical churnalism we might expect for any startup seeking PR or investment. (See: Irish Independent results and Irish Times results). That the article's content reads like an advert and the author an apparent SPA/COI contributor is also a concern. The subject's website also seems to be offline for well over a year. Suggesting it may not be operating as a going concern. And hence unlikely to "gain" notability in the future. In any event, mine is a firm "delete" recommendation (as isn't notable now, and wasn't notable when AfC accepted). Article stands only as an out-of-date advert for an otherwise non-notable company. Guliolopez (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Was not a notable company, and now defunct. Spleodrach (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.