Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gredy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gredy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) removed by author. Non-notable product, no reliable sources found to make this notable. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: author posted a comment on the article's talk page. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did Google searches, on news and on everything. Few references to this product at all, none WP:RS. Also looked at the refs provided in author's comment (see above). They include a powerpoint describing the product from (I'm guessing) the product's maker and a pdf of a testing automation magazine that does not seem to mention the product at all. The nearest to an RS provided was a very brief description in someone's blog. Nor do I see anything that suggests that I would find evidence of notability, if only I knew where to look. If author would like to post new citations that are actually WP:RS, I would be happy to review and change my mind, if warranted. But, as it stands, it's not even close to notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I reviewed the sources noted in the article talk page and none of them represent independent reliable sources. In searching, I can find no coverage whatsoever about this software in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Hobbes Goodyear. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.