Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gratis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gratis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a definition. Fails WP:NOTDICT. - Mr X 23:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom NikolaiHo^☎️ 01:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This in not really an encyclopedic topic covered in multiple reliable sources. It is word with definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary (as noted by the nom). Steve Quinn (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.