Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grasshopper (software)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Grasshopper (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete- unsourced since 2008, there seems to be a trend of deletion requests of software articles that have gone 20 years without a single source, which is rare to see on Wikipedia. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- anyway, it fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.