Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Period (Unix)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Grace Period (Unix) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
One-sentence article. Orphaned. No sources. No content. Message from XENUu, t 19:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom due to lack of context and reliable third party sources. RFerreira (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (A1: how steak is done) — No context. MuZemike (talk) 21:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.
SIS23:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per above: lack of context and no reliable sources either. Cliff smith talk 00:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It is trivial to find sources to verify the facts of this article; just look at any UNIX manual. The article doesn't completely lack in context either, as it links to the articles on disk quota, which is the context. However, I'm not convinced that an article on the grace period itself is needed when the concept is already covered in the article on disk quotas. --Itub (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article only describes the grace period associated with disk quotas, but not say, the one specified by the -g flag of the Solaris shutdown command, or the lockd grace period. This could be attributed to the fact that it is OR. William Avery (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.