Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gossip (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gossip (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely any reference or notability. Mention me on any reply. Greatder (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Greatder (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with Greatder, dosen't have enough cited notability for WP:SOFT#Inclusion. Search results return mainly information from GNOME, the Linux desktop environment it was developed under.

Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 13:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/delete Maybe useful in its times but no sources from what we see as generally notable citations from the industry. NatalieTT (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 14:15, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: @Greatder: the only independent coverage I could find is a single sentence in this book, nowhere near satisfying WP:NSOFT. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.