Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoatTracker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GoatTracker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant independent coverage for this software. Pcap ping 01:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 01:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There are two PDFs given as references, but just because something appears in PDF format, it does make it a reliable source. One is from "SIDin Magazine", which describes itself as "A Sid paper magazine for Sid people!" and at the bottom has "Wants to contribute? e-mail me." The other is a tutorial from The C64 scene database, a site with user-contributed contents. It also appears in a book from Alphascript Publishing (no editorial control), and that appears to be a rip off Wikipedia; see [1]. Pcap ping 04:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 04:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have no idea if "SIDin Magazine" is qualified as a reliable source but I am going to guess it isn't. JBsupreme (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For all practical purpose is a WP:SPS. The article is authored by Stefano Tognon, the same guy that edits the magazine. The magazine was cited in a footnote here, but that doesn't seem enough to make it a WP:RS. The SIDin articles are written in pretty bad English, so they're rather useless... Pcap ping 09:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stumbled upon this while looking through different tracker pages, it's definitely notable and useful. Shii (tock) 23:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.