Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go nap

Go nap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just a dictionary definition plus other information appropriate for a dictionary: etymology, derived terms, usage examples. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I don't see evidence that this article can be expanded significantly beyond a dictionary entry for this term. Nothing indicates that this phrase itself is encyclopedically notable by the standards of WP:N and WP:WORDISSUBJECT. —Bkell (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article has an origin section providing a history of the expression. So clearly not just a dic def. As an American I never heard of this expression, so I personally found it interesting. Seems to meet WP:GNG as well.4meter4 (talk) 03:59, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with 4meter4 that the expression is interesting, but I don't see it meeting WP:SIGCOV. Apart from the citations for the 'usage' section, all other citations in the article are from dictionaries. Katiedevi (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICT; doesn't get much clearer than this. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yes, interesting as it is, Wiktionary also has the etymology. And I fail to find the Sigcov that brings this article above a DICDEF. LightlySeared (talk) 18:37, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete per WP:NOTDICT. Mag2k (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]