Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Give it a Name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a Name

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources for this music festival. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Having no reliable sources isn't a valid deletion arguement. This festival ran for five years across the UK and Europe. There's simply no way that there's no coverage of this. Read WP:BEFORE. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide those sources? The only source I could find is this somewhat trivial mention of it. The main content (the bands who played) is entirely unsourced which isn't great for BLPs there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
This AfD had been closed, but reopened as a result of review. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm kinda surprised too there aren't significant reliable sources for this. But we can't just assume they might be out there somewhere either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Fairly easily meets WP:N requirements with coverage in multiple third-party reliable sources. [1] [2] [3] [4] NME also had reviews multiple years, including May 13, 2006: pp. 48–49. and May 12, 2007: p. 45. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:N upon a review of sources posted above by Paul Erik. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll withdraw this in light of Paul Erik's sources. That'll allow a non-admin closure. I'll be sure to check those sites next time. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.