Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gitz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted as G3 vandalism (and a hint of A7). Mfield (Oi!) 04:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Nice doggy (talk) 05:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a pure dictionary definition, and so not suitable for Wikipedia. Additionally, I can find no evidence that the neologism defined would meet Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion, "Gitz" is used as a surname and "flash gitz" (variously capitalised) appears to be a term used in one or more wargaming games, although I couldn't work out what it means. All this adds up to a transwiki being inaproproate, hence my recommendation to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - slang neologism. Lacks reliable sources. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete junk. Also note all edits by article author are vandalism. JuJube (talk) 04:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.