Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Licensed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get Licensed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't really have a corporate analogue of WP:BLP1E, but if we did, this would be it. A company with zero non-PR sources other than a brief storm over one provider exceeding class ratios, mainly supported by press releases saying how the firm reacted tremendously well to the problem. The article was started by a WP:SPA who hasn't edited since, and it was obvious promotion from the outset.

There's nothing here of any substance at all, and the first ten pages of Google only yield directories and press releases. Guy (Help!) 20:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:55, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above, was not able to find quality sources. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.