Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetSimple CMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GetSimple CMS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite many refs, none seem to show any notability at all. Fails basic WP:GNG . There are very many CMS packages out there and this has nothing special to commend it in terms of notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All my searches found nothing else aside from the current sources. Unless notability is established and other sources are found, I'm inclined to delete. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can find a few sources not used in the current article showing that it has some, albeit limited, coverage. [1] (a review of the software), [2] Unfortunately, these sources do not provide me with enough evidence to confidently say that the software is notable enough to keep the article. However, I believe it is just lacking some other coverage so am not currently making a vote just yet. — Jordan Mussi ^Talk 15:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.