Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetRight (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Add the additional sources. (non-admin closure) Bobherry Talk Edits 14:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GetRight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and fails Wikipedia's General notability guideline. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Additional coverage was identified at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetRight (2nd nomination) but was not added to the article. Peter James (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looking at the links above, I tend to agree, it looks like it was notable software, commonly in use. To round out the article, as there were too few references on it, I have added the links above, from the previous afd discussion. Looking at some of them, indeed GetRight looks like it was at least, a fairly well known application. Some of the links look like they are not working, but may be findable on the Internet Archive. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above; sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. gongshow talk 09:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.