Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetGreat.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GetGreat.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
promotional website, not notable Spanneraol (talk) 00:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete new website. Opened without any media interest.[1] gidonb (talk) 00:57, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Just as a head-up, it's "GetGreat" not "GotGreat", so your Google search should look like this. Greg Tyler (t • c) 09:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable, third-party sources, just a link to the website and its sponsor. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Just a new sports website, not ESPN.com, not notable. American Eagle (talk) 03:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTE. Nothing more to say. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 07:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable now with the potential to be notable in the future.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 13:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no assertion of popularity through reliable sources. Alexius08 (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. - Masonpatriot (talk) 14:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.