Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geomodeling Technology Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geomodeling Technology Corporation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company because the only listed source is their website and my searches found nothing particularly good with the best being here, here and here. There's also no target for moving elsewhere. Another case of easy PRODing but I wanted comments for weight. SwisterTwister talk 00:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Says they were founded almost 20 years ago and have operations in numerous countries. They are probably notable in the purest sense of their size. However, given that the article has zero sources at all, it's all just original research that needs purging. If they are notable, hopefully someone will re-start the page at some point with proper sources.CorporateM (Talk) 17:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.