Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoSOS
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GeoSOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod. Non-notable software. With the exception of self-published references, there are no verifiable or reliable sources found. No significant GHits for GeoSOS among numerous hits for Geos OS. 1 GScholar hit (self-published). No GNews/Book hits. Li and Liu are both on the research team for the software, see here. GregJackP (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks promotional, no evidence of notability. --LordPistachio talk 06:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability per WP:N. Its hard to tell what the 'references' are actually referring to, but I suspect they're primary sources. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 10:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.