Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin O'Reilly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin O'Reilly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not Significant enough. Evolvedtyrant (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Ireland, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Evolvedtyrant… Could you elaborate your concerns to enable a good debate? Prima facie the CEO of a large media group and chair of the world newspaper body, with coverage, does not seem an obvious concern re notability. SeoR (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - well-sourced and seems to meet WP:GNG - Alison ^talk 03:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - there’s significant coverage, but the article is so poorly written and organized that it’s close to WP:TNT. Bearian (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - well sourced. @Evolvedtyrant:, I understand this is your first time nominating an article for deletion but your explanation needs to be far more in-depth than "Not Significant enough". What's not significant? The person? The coverage? Otherwise please do not nominate articles on a whim if you are unfamiliar with notability guidelines. Thanks. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 11:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems notable still, sourcing ok, 1-2 points I will check. Cleaned up some repetition / cruft. Seconding above - putting articles for AfD with under 100 edits, and perhaps not a full study of policy, might be premature. SeoR (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - looks like they are notable, meets WP:GNG. Spleodrach (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article needs some cleanup but it should be kept. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.