Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gas spore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Gas spore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Gas spore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional monster that fails WP:GNG. The name is also pretty vague and can refer to various IRL things. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

• Keep or merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable fictional creature. There are no non-primary sources being used in the article, and searches bring up nothing but a few brief mentions in a couple of "Top Ten" style humor pieces. There is no substantial coverage to indicate any sort of notability. Rorshacma (talk) 22:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - The reception is completely trivial, so it still fails GNG. TTN (talk) 11:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.