Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameKnot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 19:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- GameKnot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains no assertion of notability. Toccata quarta (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, because there is quite some results in the Google News Archive search. EditorE (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All those sources appear to contain nothing more than just passing references to GameKnot. Can you show any that discuss primarily GameKnot? Toccata quarta (talk) 04:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there are no secondary sources to establish notability. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 02:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article has no sources that are independent of the subject two weeks after the AFD nomination. If it is possible for the article to meet WP:GNG requirements, no one has stepped up to demonstrate it yet. Quale (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As noted above, there is ample coverage in the Google News archive including several NYT articles.Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there any sources that discuss primarily GameKnot? The ones I saw contained only passing mentions. Toccata quarta (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't have any luck finding sources at all. All I saw in the GNews search was GameKnot's own website. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 00:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- True, it's pretty thin once you dig down. :( Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't have any luck finding sources at all. All I saw in the GNews search was GameKnot's own website. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 00:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there any sources that discuss primarily GameKnot? The ones I saw contained only passing mentions. Toccata quarta (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found no real sources after a Google search. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 19:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.