Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galvanize (Bootcamp)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 06:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Galvanize (Bootcamp)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a coding education program, not referenced to anywhere near enough reliable source coverage about it in media to clear WP:CORPDEPTH -- this is referenced almost entirely to its own primary source content about itself, with just two pieces of purely local media coverage in the local media of its own head office location. This is not how you source something like this as notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Bearcat (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete borderline promotional article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Forbes and USAToday. Bootcamps are pretty popular, I imagine there are more sources. Article is lame. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.