Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GaffGun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GaffGun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable product, also reads a bit like an add. Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for total lack of third-party sources. Alexius08 (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Homepage video has 675K views on Vimeo and product has been featured on Gizmodo, among other places. 2601:601:C501:5900:21B8:A016:CA36:48F6 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 17:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless it can be mentioned at another article aside from the only outlinking article (tape dispenser) as my searches found nothing good aside from this and this. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.