Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Log (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 00:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G-Log

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this company meets (or met) WP:NCORP. It's not traded, it doesn't have a notable product (even assumed by Oracle, the buyer). I'm not seeing a ton of in-depth independent coverage towards the GNG, either. There are a couple of claims of awards, but no references towards those and I can't find anything covering them, either -- plus they're about the founder, not the company itself. Mikeblas (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Consists of frame contents only, i.e. when it was founded, when it was disolved, and its business focus. Ask yourself, why people of 100 years from now would want to know about this company? Did it have impact? What was it? flowing dreams (talk page) 11:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Technically not eligible for a soft delete as there was a prod in 2008 (not to mention the first AfD which ended no consensus). Given the age of the article, I am relisting to see if a broader consensus than two participants can be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Only two sources found: 1, 2. Both are about Oracle, subject should be mentioned in Oracle, not in its own article. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 03:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.