Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion Cosmetics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion Cosmetics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's topic is a fictional cosmetics company of the near-ending series All My Children. The fact that the show is cancelling encouraged me to create this discussion. It is possible to insert true perspectives and lessen the in-universes. However, I wonder if our time to edit this article is time-consuming. To be honest, this article has potential, but it appeared to be a resemblance of a fan dedication to the show and the long-time character Erica Kane. The page has a history log; if deleted as voted, then history log will be inaccessible. Therefore, no reverts or revivals without further third-party publications. The primary sources are of ABC. ~~Gh87 (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)~~ Just one "neutral" and one "delete"? Take my delete, and one becomes two. --Gh87 (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral for now. Since some of these products were sold in real-life stores, I think there is some notability here. Flyer22 (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is no evidence to suggest that the fictional cosmetics or the real cosmetics meet the general notability guideline. Even if the real world cosmetics exist, it does not mean that they are notable. Notability requires verifiable evidence and I see nothing of the sort even with a search engine test. Jfgslo (talk) 00:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even with a search test? You say even as if search tests were some kind of guarantee. Here is what the page you link to has to say about them:

"Raw "hit" (search result) count is a very crude measure of importance. Some unimportant subjects have many "hits", some notable ones have few or none" Weakopedia (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:43, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.