Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funimation Channel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funimation Channel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everything in this article is covered on the main Funimation Entertainment page Ke5crz (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article has many more sources than FE page and no real reason for deletion beyond duplication of the lede has been cited. The company and channel are two separate things and because of that, there should be no merge. Nate • (chatter) 04:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Nate pretty much sums it up, the two are related but are seperate, article is Notable enough for a stand alone article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Echo of above rationales. --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 23:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge At the moment, there is just not enough content for a stand-alone article. But deletion is not the answer. —Farix (t | c) 16:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable channel. Dream Focus 13:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.