Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Functionality Equivalence Verification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Functionality Equivalence Verification

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub was redirected to software testing years ago, but term is not described there or anywhere else on enwiki. Google suggests the term is related to equivalence checking, or it's possibly related to functional equivalence, but the use of this specific term is unclear. Deletion should be considered unless a proper redirect/merge target can be identified. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 02:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This fails WP: GNG, and I regrettably can't support either redirect target. Equivalence checking appears to be a little too focused on hardware for this article to be a good redirect target in this case, and functional equivalence is a disambiguation page. HyperAccelerated (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.