Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreshMinds (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FreshMinds

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn’t find any coverage in good sources that give detailed news about the company. I don’t think it meets notability policy for companies. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:CORPDEPTH. - Hatchens (talk) 12:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Caroline Plumb as WP:ATD. Topic company fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability, redirect is the best solution. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redirecting to the CEO page may not be appropriate but do see the value. Agree there is not established notability. Chronotime (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:CORPDEPTH. Also, it is clearly promotional. Furthermore, it was created by a single-purpose account User:Charlieosmond. Anton.bersh (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.