Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free YouTube to MP3 Converter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to DVDVideoSoft. slakr^\ talk / 13:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free YouTube to MP3 Converter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable piece of software, the page is being use for advertiesment. CombatWombat42 (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. hmssolent^lambast _{patrol records} 09:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & Redirect to DVDVideoSoft. Not notable based on WP:NSOFTWARE standards. I found two Russian books that had only trivial coverage. Some of the cited sources (e.g. pc-magazin.de) do seem to be curated download collections that include a short review, but taken on the whole they still do not establish notability in my opinion. The company may not be notable either, but since the article exists, this article's contents should be moved there rather than deleted. I would consider nominating Free Audio Converter, Free Video Call Recorder for Skype, Free YouTube Download, Free Video Dub, Free AVI Video Converter, and Free Studio (seems a bit more notable) for deletion as well. ––Agyle (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 23:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to DVDVideoSoft per Agyle, the refs are primarily brief reviews/download sites, and not sufficient to establish notability independent of the parent company. Article is short enough that a merge would not be a problem.Dialectric (talk) 15:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.