Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Basin Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fraser Basin Council

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria due to a lack of significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't have enough reliable sources. Darkm777 (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's notability guidelines, but as someone who lives in BC and has heard lots of local political discussions, I know the Fraser Basin Council is a notable player in our local environmental scene. They have been cited by the CBC and are noted on our provincial government's website. For what it's worth. Snacks (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable organization as per WP:ORGSIG. As an ATD the organization and one source could be viable (content) at Fraser Plateau and Basin complex. However, this article has only one source so does currently not pass GNG or WP:GEONATURAL so needs additional sources for notability. The same applies to Interior Plateau. There is no article under the larger Northern Plateaus province to which all of these could be merged (or created and merged) so what is left but to delete. -- Otr500 (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't have enough reliable sources. Darkm777 (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.