Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Comelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. slakr^\ talk / 08:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Comelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable instrument maker. Winged Blades^Godric 15:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Being well known according to a RS (Cooper 2008 [1]) and held in museums of the history of science and technology, seems enough for GNG to me. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy I'm not sold that the subject passes GNG with these passing mentions. This article should not have been written. Still, if the consensus is delete I'd like the closing admin to put this into my userspace so I can rehab this and perhaps republish someday. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- a harmless stub. Perhaps one day someone will produce a proper bio. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--An AFD could not be decided on whether a stub/article is harmless or not.Ridiculous argument!Please argue on basis of WP:GNG.Winged Blades^Godric 03:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.