Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum Nintendo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as there was no indication of significance or importance (CSD A7). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forum Nintendo

Non-notable website - a forum with 233 members is almost bound to fail notability. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 18:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I will have to concur. It's also a conflict of interest, as a user named Forum-Nintendo wrote the article. (I've rescued a couple COIs of late with either a full rewrite or revert, but this one has never been neutral.) Raymie Humbert (local radar | current conditions) 18:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Possibly speedy. Non-notable forum, spam, COI, etc. Lugnuts (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:CSD A7: an article about a website which does not assert that its subject is notable.--Unscented (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with speedy deletion. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as above. -- samj _in ^out 20:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.