Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fons Hickmann (3rd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK and WP:SNOW. Warden (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Fons Hickmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Last discussion withdrawn for no reason. Not sure if notable. From what German I can read, the only hits on Gnews are passing mentions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Possibly the nom. of the second AfD read the first AfD. The arguments there , which indicated a remarkably high number of good sources, still hold. Sufficient apparent secondary coverage. The German WP has in general a considerably stricter requirement for notability than we do, and I would normally defer to them on German topics. I don't see that it has ever been even challenged there. DGG ( talk ) 22:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and speedy close per DGG's sound arguments. And it is barely the work of a moment to discover, via Google translate, that the nominator's assertion that the GNews hits are only "passing mentions" is completely unfounded and utter nonsense. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- So are you going to add the sources, or just let it stink up the joint forever?! Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.