Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlipKey
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- FlipKey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nomination for deletion under A7, G11 NaturalScholar (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (warn) @ 23:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (lecture) @ 23:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can find passing mentions of people advertising on Flipkey among other sites, and on TripAdviser taking a majority share in 2008, but nothing to establish WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:NWEB notability in its own right. It is already covered in sufficient depth on the TripAdvisor page. AllyD (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.