Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flex expert system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flex expert system

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2014, never fixed. Cited sources do not meet the trifecta of reliable, independent, secondary. Mostly self-published. The creator of the article believes it is NPOV, but since he's involved with the product I don't feel inclined to accept his view on that. Guy (Help!) 12:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very non notable, no secondary coverage given nor can I find any in searching. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.