Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flazio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flazio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. For previous discussions, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_346#Flazio DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources include a self-published Forbes article that was misleadingly characterized. Little to indicate noteworthiness. Dorama285 00:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 01:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It fails WP:GNG; and apparently doesn't look much notable enough (at least based on my research) to be kept, despite having approximate notability. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.