Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisciculture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fisciculture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a newly-coined neologism made up by two friends, and as such is unverifiable, non-encyclopedic content. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. — sparklism ^hey! 07:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wish that there was a speedy category that covered this, since it's one of those things that was thought up one day and has not yet become notable. The claims that it would be included in the upcoming releases of dictionaries does not seem to be actually backed up by any reliable sources and the term itself lacks reliable sources in any context to show that it's widely used or notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Term presumably conjured into existence by the article author and no evidence that it meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One of the cited coiners is Amrit Sinha and the article author is Amrit 3082 (talk · contribs). Amrit must be a common name. —Tamfang (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO. No coverage found in reliable sources for this term. Gongshow ^Talk 14:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO and WP:ONEDAY. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO. ~~Redirect to Fish farming~~ – The definition of Fisciculture in the article is entirely incorrect, and is almost certainly original research. However, this is an actual term regarding the distribution and locating of fish by humans. Here are some source examples: From 1889 CE, From 1874 CE. It appears that in contemporary times, "Fisciculture" is not used very often, with "Pisciculture" being the more common contemporary usage. Also, "Pisciculture" currently redirects to the Fish farming article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Could those be OCR errors or other mis-reading of pisciculture? The Deseret News piece includes the word only in the headline (unless I missed another instance) where the letter is not clear. It looks to me like it could be P or F. Cnilep (talk) 06:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You know what, upon review the Deseret News piece appears to be a scan error in which the letter P is obscured, appearing as an F. The second source is probably a typographical error. Therefore, I've modified my !vote above. Thanks for the astute observation! Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO. Deletetantisme. Francl (talk) 11:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.