Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First tuesday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First tuesday

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails our notability requirements in general and the corporation specific one in particular. Although the article appears to be sourced, this is misleading because the sources from what I can see are either the company's website or do not mention the subject at all. Reyk _YO! 07:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure spam. Commercial provider of courses in real estate. Not a degree-granting institution. No coverage to demonstrate notability. --MelanieN (talk) 04:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable spam piece. Fails WP:ORG. All 11 sources are fairly useless. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Advertising. Carrite (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom. scope_creep (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete outright advert spam. WP:ORG not met despite the link spam that is basically all self-referenced or similar dubious stuff. Ryan Norton 08:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.