Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Ones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First Ones

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I actually really like Babylon 5, but this is a monumental pile of cruft. Not a single source, and all of it is written in an in-universe plot summary style. There's no content that could be merged anywhere, and as a redirect the title would be vague enough to be both confusing and useless. Reyk _YO! 18:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Reyk._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.