Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Mile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First Mile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of ~~the required 3~~ any articles to pass WP:GNG, only the Times article has limited coverage of the company, and might be considered non WP:ROUTINE press. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Too much uncited content, much of which looks like a commercial, or likely to be marketing prose originating from the company. Spideog (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This company does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There is insufficient evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Gedaali (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No sign of the required 3 articles to pass WP:GNG... No idea where you got the idea of a required three articles from. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That was a silly error on my part. I just generally look for 3 as a good benchmark. Allan Nonymous (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It happens. I believe I have said the same at times. There is an essay called WP:THREE which we sometimes use as a guide at AfC, but no requirement. Thanks for striking. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is NO requirement that a company needs to have three articles (assuming you mean references) to meet WP:GNG. It does however need to have more than one that meet WP:ORGCRIT. Unfortunately it doesn't have those. I found plenty of mentions but nothing in-depth. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.