Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firepower Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Firepower Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sources I could find for this record label today refer to the 2018 sexual allegations of its founder, Datsik (musician) as well as the songs signed to this label. No other significant coverage can be found, but I do not believe the 2018 events are enough to satisfy independent notability for the record label. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only two references (three technically), only one of which (UKF) actually being reliable and usable. Writing format seems biased and unprofessional. Artist section had a bunch of seemingly random (or previously part of the label?) artists added to the list that aren't listed in the reference. Beatport cannot be used as a source in any case, including as a discography page reference. Micro (Talk) 03:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a comment, I'm not convinced even UKF is reliable... it's essentially the work of one man, Dave Jenkins. There are a couple of other contributors listed, but absolutely no biographical information about them, so we have no idea of their credentials, they could just be unpaid volunteers. Richard3120 (talk) 12:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fail WP:NCORP & WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I agree it fails WP:NCORP & WP:PROMO Actaudio (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.