Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy Pair : Zack and Aerith
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 01:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Final Fantasy Pair : Zack and Aerith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Backstory on a pair of characters from FF7 is too derived to be of encyclopedic value. Also is unlikely to ever contain anything but OR. -- Selket Talk 16:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced. Unencyclopedic. OR. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Nothing but one giant original research personal essay regarding fanfiction. Absolutely not appropriate for Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me 17:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete, Wikipedia is not fanfiction. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. This article is no more than speculation by a fan. Metagame (talk) 01:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete per above. This (along with the other articles the user has added that are up for some form of deletion) are non-encyclopedic, fancruft, and pretty much everything that WP:NOT stands for. I'd say this should be closed now as a snow delete because there's just no saving this entry in any way, shape, or form.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.