Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy Pair: Cloud and Lightning
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 01:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Final Fantasy Pair: Cloud and Lightning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced. Original Research. Reads like a fan essay, not an encyclopedia page. TexasAndroid (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:NOTFORUM, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NOTBLOG... I could go on. I really wish there were speedy criteria for this sort of thing. --BDD (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Nothing but one giant original research personal essay regarding fanfiction. Absolutely not appropriate for Wikipedia. (Not even very good by forum post standards really.) Sergecross73 msg me 17:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete There are no sources and the article even admits that the two characters have never even met making this couple even weaker than it initally appears.--208.124.208.90 (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you even discussing it? --Niemti (talk) 22:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete, Wikipedia is not fanfiction. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. No sources and completely unencyclopedic, among other things. Metagame (talk) 01:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. This is another one of those examples of something that's everything that WP:NOT is here for. Unfortunately this is something that doesn't fit neatly into any of the speedy categories, so it has to come to AfD. Can we get this snow closed? This doesn't have a chance of surviving.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.