Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy Casual
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Filthy Casual (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claims without sources. References consist of press releases, WP:SELFPUB, and one defunct source. Generally, not WP:INDEPENDENT. TLA (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, Fashion, Canada, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The only things I could find on it seem to be from the company itself or just business listings. I couldn't find any third-party coverage or anything substantial enough to warrant an article. The current references are dead but are archived - unfortunately they appear to only be more promotional material from the company itself (i.e. doesn't meet WP:RS).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.