Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FileReplacement
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FileReplacement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an obscure implementation detail of UseModWiki. The article tries to dress it up as some general mechanism, but that's clearly not the case. While the contents is probably verifiable by checking the source of UseModWiki, I don't think it passes WP:N. Pcap ping 09:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 09:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is indeed not a common feature of wiki software. While (highly!) limited versions exist in some other software (see MediaWiki:Monobook.js, for example), it's not known by this name outside UseMod and certainly doesn't have the scope that this article would imply. The fact that Meatball's entry categorizes it as "CategoryUncommonWikiTechnology" should also be a hint that this is far from common practice. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't think that wikipedia is the place for this. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.