Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedspikes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Feedspikes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I came across this page on NPP and cannot find any reliable, 3rd-party sources for it, so I am nominating it for deletion as it fails the general notability guideline. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, no reliable sources, created by an SPA so possibly spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.