Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federated Commonwealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to BattleTech#Universe. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Federated Commonwealth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of out of the universe notability. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to BattleTech#Universe. BOZ (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge some of it in to BattleTech#Universe - It's way too long for the entire lot to be Merged bur perhaps Merging the important parts in to BattleTech#Universe would be better ... –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 04:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- excessively long, in-universe plot summary with nonexistent sourcing and no evidence of meeting any of our notability requirements. Reyk _YO! 09:15, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ceradon (talk • contribs) 05:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with BattleTech#Universe. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 05:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.