Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawn Liebowitz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fawn Liebowitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unremarkable fictional character. Provided references do not demonstrate notability. Band of the same name does not meet notability guidelines either. Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge fictional character info and redirect to National Lampoon's Animal House; delete non-notable band info. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm not sure it merits even a merge or redirect. Шизомби (Sz) (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've got to agree, its a minor character, a merge is not warranted. I'm starting to wonder if the article was created to promote the band.--RadioFan (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see a reliable source here. Jclemens (talk) 18:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Normally I'd support a merge, but this "character" has no lines and no screen time. Edward321 (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Claritas § 15:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.