Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fausto Ferrara
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/Rational 17:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fausto Ferrara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Highly promotional and no evidence of WP:SUSTAINED notability backed up by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 16:15, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Architecture, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify – Looks LLM generated. Svartner (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 16:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Reads like a CV, nothing to show notability found. Some of the links seem iffy. Oaktree b (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Most of the links are simply database listings, nothing substantive. Oaktree b (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. This does not read like an encyclopedia article and most of the citations are to databases, directories, or passing mentions. This article suffers serious WP:CITEBLOAT that looks like an attempt to give the appearance of notability and a well-sourced article when there is no underlying substance. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 06:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.