Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatpipe Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fatpipe Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by COI user, speedy deleted 7 times before, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP non notable awards no in depth coverage in independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if the case could be made for notability, the current article is clearly not in Wikipedia style. The over-use of capital letters and acronyms smells of marketing-speak. W Nowicki (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt per above, and a history of recreation, e.g. FatPipe Networks & Talk:FatPipe Networks. ^Avic _ennasis @ 07:52, 24 Kislev 5777 / 07:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.